How CNN botched the YouTube presidential debate

News: The first “experiment” is over. Today, we have time to reflect on what happened — and didn’t happen — in last night’s presidential debate for the Democratic candidates. As I said in my last post, I give CNN and YouTube an A for the idea of user-generated questions, but a C+ for the execution. Here’s what CNN messed up (although the Democratic Party and candidates may have been responsible for the format):

1. There was no opportunity for real debate or exchanges among candidates. The candidates had only 1 minute or 30 seconds to answer questions. No substantive question was asked of each of the candidates–meaning we never got the chance to compare all the candidates on a single question, even though many of the YouTube users posed their questions specifically to the entire group of candidates. For a 2 hour debate, that’s pretty appalling.

CNN, however, chose not to allow all the candidates a chance to answer. Sen. Dodd even expressed frustration at not having a chance to answer the important question about global warming. The only question that CNN posed to the entire group of candidates was the stupid last question in which the candidates were asked to say something they liked about the candidate on their left, and then something they didn’t like.  Are we back in 1st grade?

2. Anderson Cooper played favorites with the candidates and skipped over Senator Gravel. Sen. Mike Gravel protested not getting asked many questions compared to the other candidates repeatedly during the debate. By my count, Gravel got only 9 questions (often trivial ones), while Barack Obama got 19 questions. Don’t even include the guy on stage if you are not really going to include him in the debate.

3. CNN excluded all questions from children, but then included a question from a snowman. Cooper said that he thought the parents were using their children to ask their questions. So what? The guy who used the snowman got on CNN’s debate. Remember, from the mouth of babes.

4. CNN used only 11 questions from female questioners, but 28 questions from male questioners. OK, I don’t know the relative breakdown in the pool of 3,000 questions. But the disparity in questions between male and females was very noticeable to me.

5. Having follow up with 2 of the questioners live in the audience only wasted time. This really didn’t work. Anderson Cooper asked, “Did they answer your question?” One of the guys basically said he couldn’t hear the answer because someone next to him was making noise. The other guy used his follow up to say that he wanted to have the question asked of Hillary Clinton.

6. CNN chose some pretty gimmicky questions for laughs and even wasted more time showing questions not used for more laughs. CNN wasted precious time on videos shown to generate laughs–a snowman asking a question, a guy singing and asking for a pardon on his parking ticket, two country guys asking if the talk about Al Gore running for president hurt their feelings, the last question asking each candidate to say something good and bad about the person to the left. There probably were more, but you get the picture.

7. The 30-second campaign videos were nice, but took time away from the debate. I liked the campaign videos, but just have people go to YouTube to watch them. CNN shouldn’t take away precious time from the debate.

Advertisements

4 Responses to How CNN botched the YouTube presidential debate

  1. Casey says:

    “The Future of our Country” the new electives of our president

    I feel sorry for my son’s after listing to these people (one of which will be our future President) I have never been more ashamed to call my self an American than I do now.

    I know how most of the countries view us, I have been to most of them and know it by first hand. Mark my works when I say, these candidates will only bring America to its weakest point
    I have served our country and my oldest son is doing so now in Iraq, I have always stood by my Commander in Chief, but I do not feel that I could do so with any of these candidates. These people are a joke to the American way and what it takes to preserve it.
    People have forgotten why America went their, THE ATTACK ON OUR SOIL, objectives might have changed, but it still boils down to the same thing.

    We will see more out of this country (Iraq), I just hope that these people can see what is going on before we are the next victim…Yet again.

    Casey

  2. bonnie says:

    The CNN Democrratic debate was a JOKE!!!!!!!! Could Wolf Blitzer have SALIVATED over HiLLARY any more???

    Hey Wolft, take some lessons from Tim Russert. He at least asked HARD QUESIONS. The audience was cerrtanly PRO HIILLARY and the lady with the son int he Military has been seen before as a Pro Hillary, anti war lady.

  3. Richard says:

    Mr. Anderson Cooper appeared [caught] off-guard by Senator Thompson’s uTube style campaign add during the Republican debates. Previewing and proofing the candidates campaign ads went right out the window. Great investigative journalism, AC!

  4. […] to CNN and Anderson Cooper.  I criticized you soundly for botching the Democratic debate with gimmicks and favoritism.  Much better this time around.  The results on YouTube confirm […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: